Category 4: Valuing People

Results

4R2 ~ Results for Valuing People

The college views our low turnover rate and high average tenure rate as indirect results of all the processes related to valuing people and our attractive compensation packages.

For FY2006-2007, the turnover rate for full-time employees was 4.1% and for FY 2007-2008, the rate increased slightly to 5.2% (these numbers include deaths).  The current average tenure for a full-time employee is 15.3 years. Figure 4.6 provides View Figure 4.6a breakdown of tenure by different work groups.

Some specific results for the value we place on our employees can be seen in recent (2007 – 2008) enhancements made to employee earnings and benefits.  Increases in base wages occurred; a patient advocacy vendor was added to two of the health plans; dental benefits were increased; a vision plan was added, and certain domestic partners of MATC employees became eligible for insurance coverage. Some may be compromised by the severe budget shortfall for FY2010.

According to payroll records, between 2003 and 2008 the college paid tuition reimbursement to 167 people totaling $328,220 through the Tuition Reimbursement Programs for all employee groups.

One of the most tangible results of valuing people comes from our system of Shared Governance, which is a fundamental vehicle for managing the college. In order to View figure 4.7achieve this system, faculty are given release time to take leadership roles in core committees and other important initiatives.  Figure 4.7 presents the number of full- and part-time specialized leadership assignments for FY2009.

The results in our training and education activities are shown in Figure 4.8, whichView Figure 4.8 indicates that employees are consistently taking Professional Development courses for self-improvement and skill development.

In addition to consistent enrollments, the satisfaction surveys demonstrate the value of these courses to the participants. The next survey will be conducted in 2010.

Through ER&D, Peer Support remains an important and successful training program forS new faculty. Figure 4.9 shows faculty participation numbers in View Figure 4.9Peer Support while Figure 4.10 provides a snapshot of positive training results among faculty.View Figure 4.10

Since implementing the Employee Wellness Program, a number of positive results have been measured and collected: