Prior to the 1960's, there were two competing ideas about the origin of the universe. One called the Steady State Theory and the other called the Big Bang. The Steady State Theory claimed that the universe had no beginning ... will not have an end ... is infinite ... will expand forever ... and never change. To keep the universe from changing ... new matter had to be created in the void left by expansion. If you have a PC running Windows, you may have seen the "flying windows" or "moving stars" screen saver. This is very much like the Steady State Theory.
The Big Bang (animatiopn)
The Big Bang Model simply traces the expansion back to a time when all matter was together. It proposes that the universe had an instant of creation and it is still expanding as a result of this "explosion". But which model is correct?
In the 1960's, a prediction was made that if the universe was created in a Big Bang, there should be residual radiation from it and it should permeate all of space. In 1964, Arno Penzias and Bob Wilson, working for the Bell Laboratories, discovered this "cosmic background radiation". It confirmed that Big Bang Model ... now all we have to do is work out the details.
The Big Bang is not like any explosion you've ever witnessed. It is literally an explosion of reality ... the creation of matter, energy, space and time. It is pointless to ask what happened before the Big Bang ... there was nothing. Or to ask what caused it! It is an excellent boundary between science and religion simply because no scientist can investigate it, explain it, or predict its occurrence.
Today, astronomers believe the universe was created somewhere around ~14 billion years ago. The exact time depends on the rate of expansion ... and that is a problem since it is difficult to know exactly how far away some very distant objects actually are.
Here are a couple of interesting breakthroughs. When accurate maps of
the cosmic background radiation were made, it was found that it is
very, very smooth and uniform (but not totally). Yet the universe
that we know is very lumpy. How did this radiation start out so uniform?
One idea assumes the universe underwent a very rapid period of expansion
in its initial stages. This is known as inflation.
In this model, the universe went from the size of an atom to the size of a
walnut in almost no time at all (much, much faster than the current rate of
expansion). If this was the case, it would help explain why we had such a
uniform universe in the past (the details are beyond the scope of this class).
|
|
Technically, a flat universe will expand forever (sometimes called marginally open). That is, it appears to have density just below the "critical density" which means it would expand forever (which is also a prediction of inflation).
What amazed astronomers in (1998) is that instead of seeing a universe that is expanding and slowing down with time ... it is possible that it is expanding and speeding up with time?!?! This "accelerating universe" was detected by two independent studies. It is as if you were throwing a ball upward in the air and (to your amazement), it started speeding up as it left your hand!!!
In order for the universe to accelerate as it expands ... there has to be some kind of "anti gravity" force pushing things apart. This mysterious force has been labeled dark energy. If these results continue to be confirmed, scientists will have to concede that the universe is indeed open, but they will have bigger challenges trying to explain the nature of this new force.
Click here for an article.
So here we are ... the very end of the class! And what can we say about the universe we live in? We don't know what 90 % of the universe is made of, and we have no way of explaining why it is moving the way it appears to be moving! Isn't science great?
Links
A super web page explaining the details of the early universe
ŠJim Mihal 2004 - all rights reserved