Answers to discussion topic questions in Unit 1
Please make sure you understand the answers before you attempt the practice quiz or unit test
Scientific Method
Is technology a trap?
We have built a society that relies on technology, not just for conveyance, but for survival. Think of what would happen if we lost electric power for an extended length of time. In one week, the food in the pantry gets low, you have no water or gasoline. No stores, banks, internet, etc. In one month, total chaos! Simply put, we can't support a huge urban population without technology. Things would get real bad, real fast. Can you grow your own food? How do you prevent others from raiding your stuff? Could this happen? Just Google something called the Carrington Event. An 1859 solar storm dismantled our only form of mass communication ... the telegraph system. If a similar event happened today the cost could be in the trillions of dollars and possibly weeks (or a year?) without electric power (worst case scenario). The trap is sprung. Have a nice day!!!
Look up "deductive reasoning" and "inductive reasoning". Define both and give an example of each. Which one best describes the scientific method?
In deductive reasoning you make a conclusion based on known truths. The result is guaranteed to be a truth provided the initial statements are true. Example: All mammals are warm blooded. Humans are mammals. Therefore, humans are warm blooded. In deduction, you work from the general to the specific. In inductive reasoning, you base your conclusion on observations. That is, you work from the specific and work toward the general. Example: I am warm blooded. Every mammal I've ever observed is warm blooded. Therefore, I must be a mammal.
Science builds its "truths" based on testable observations. The theories in science were not handed to us, but rather built up from many observations. Science is an inductive process. Inductive reasoning (like science) is subject to error. One observation can topple the status quo.
Is "intelligent design" a scientific fact, law, hypothesis, or theory? Does it belong in a science class? Support your answer.
I would call ID an un-testable hypothesis.
My Opinion: Intelligent design is a belief based on faith ... not observation. Science can only deal with testable observations and also adheres to the notion that the universe behaves in "natural processes". Intelligent design is a way of understanding how we came to be, but it is NOT science. That is not to say that your faith beliefs (whatever they may be) are worthless. I have strong religious beliefs, but you are not going to hear them from me because this is a science class.
I've heard the argument that biologists cannot answer questions like "how did life begin?". Therefore, ID offers an alternative explanation and should be taught in the classroom. There are MANY unanswered questions in science. But science doesn't simply plug the holes with an un-testable explanation. If that were the case, you could simply make anything up that can't be tested and offer it as an "alternative" solution. Science doesn't work that way. Remember, that science is a process, not an answer.
Theory, Law, Hypothesis, Fact:
I'll pick on one discipline (Geology) to give an example:
Theory: Plate Tectonics: The crust of the earth
is fragmented into rigid slabs that move with respect to each other. Their
motion explains the current topology of the earth's crust as well as events such
as mountain building, volcanoes, and earthquakes. Note: A theory is a
grand statement which may encompass many observable phenomena.
Law: In a layer of undisturbed sediments, the oldest layer is found on
the bottom and the youngest layer on the top. A law usually shows how two
or more variables are related. In this case, position is related to age.
Note: Many laws are written in the form of an equation. If you see an
equation, think law!
Hypothesis: It is possible to predict an earthquake by noticing the
behavior of animals just prior to the event. Note: There is no current
reliable way of predicting an earthquake but this is one possible connection
that is currently being investigated. It may be difficult to distinguish
between a law and hypothesis. If it looks like a guess, think hypothesis.
Fact: The tsunami of 2004 was a magnitude 9+ on the Richter scale.
This is a recorded, undeniable statement which all geologists can agree.
What is "junk science"? In your answer please make sure you make it clear how it differs from science. Give 3 examples why anyone would be motivated to use junk science.
Junk science are studies which have not been tested, scrutinized by peer reviews, not reproducible, and/or based on biased or misleading data. Junk science studies are often used when the conclusions of the study are relied on to make a decision or settle an argument ... be it legal, political, profitability, or ego. One who wants to sway opinion and/or support their agenda may even be using junk science without even knowing it. Sometimes junk science is easy to spot. For example, if the tobacco industry funds a plan to study the health issues related to smoking .... well, guess what their conclusions will be? Other times it is not so easy to spot. This is where YOU come in. Your job is to be an informed citizen and base your decisions on solid studies ... not what you read in a blog, seen in an ad, or heard on a talk show. Go to the actual studies and learn for yourself what are facts and "alternate facts".
Natural Laws
Engineers go to great lengths to find clever ways to reduce friction. Give at least one very specific example. Look over all the posts from other students to avoid any repetitions.
Most people know that we use lubricants to reduce friction. This is to prevent solid surfaces from making physical contact. Scientists have used boric acid in motor oil to radically reduce wear in engine parts. The molecules form in sheets that slide across adjacent sheets like cards in a deck. There are many other good answers here - low friction bearings (Teflon), aerodynamic car design (to reduce air friction), magnetic levitation in trains to eliminate physical contact with a surface (similar to air hockey) ... even Michael Phelps swimsuit was designed to reduce friction (go USA).
Living in a frictionless world
Typical answers are: we can't walk, cars can't move, we can't pick things up in our hands. This is all related to Newton's first law that states an object at rest will stay at rest unless a force is applied. In these cases, the force relies on friction. Some students point out that things in motion will continue in motion (again, Newton's 1st law) .... cars can't stop or turn, etc. Basically, things would be a mess without friction. On rare occasions I get students who goes beyond these answers .... like "if my car was at rest on a hillside and friction disappeared, the car would accelerate down the hill (there is still gravity and the brakes don't work and let's hope the road is straight) and then decelerate going up the next hill until it came to rest. It would then start accelerating backwards downhill until it got back to the original starting point (no losses to air friction or other places). This would continue forever."
Tough Challenge Question
All physics students know that things in a vacuum fall with an acceleration of "g". Easy Part: What is "g"?
The acceleration of gravity at the earth's surface (in a vacuum) is 9.8 m/s2 or 32 ft/s2. This means that every second the speed increases 9.8 m/s or 32 ft/s.
Hard Part: Why do all objects in a vacuum accelerate at this rate? Explain in terms of Newton's laws of motion. In your answer, resolve this conflict:
If I drop a 10 pound weight and a 20 pound weight from rest, the 20 pound weight should accelerate twice as fast since it is pulled (by gravity) with twice the force.
The 20 pound weight is pulled with twice the force as the 10 pound weight so you may think that it should accelerate at twice the rate. However, the 20 pound weight also has twice the mass (double the inertia) so it has a higher resistance to change its state of motion. Mass and weight are actually two different physical quantities but they are related. Weigh is the gravitational pull on an object - a force. Mass is a measure of inertia - how sluggish it is to changes in motion. If an object has twice the mass, it also has twice the weight. The exact conversion factor is w = mg. Basically, these two factors (mass and weight) cancel each other out and everything accelerates with the same value (in a vacuum). Here is the math:
Go back to Newton's second law a = f/m. For any falling object (in a vacuum): f=w (weight) substituting we get
a = w/m but since w=mg we can substitute again to get a = mg/m which reduces to a=g
Energy
If you are stationary and holding a bag of heavy groceries,
are you doing work? Are you expending energy?
By definition, you are doing no work because nothing is
moving. However, you are expending energy because our bodies are not
rigid solids. A chair can hold a weight without refueling, however your
body needs to exert muscles to hold an object at rest.
What if you are walking forward? Does your answer change?
By definition, the upward force you exert on the bag to
hold it up is doing no work because the motion is not in that direction.
I will certainly give you credit if you explain your NO answer this way.
In fact, that is what I was looking for in your answer. But actually the
answer is YES - you are actually doing a very little amount of work because you are exerting a
(much smaller) forward force on the groceries and they move (in that direction). You can make this a very
difficult question if you like. One could argue that you are only doing
work if the bag of groceries is accelerating (in a vacuum) in the forward direction and not
doing work if you are moving forward (in a vacuum) with a constant speed. However,
if you were initially at rest, you need to do some work to get the bag moving
in the forward direction (in real air). Add in any air friction (but not
a lot since you are mot moving very fast) and I guarantee you
are doing some work.
Robert Hooke discovered a law related to springs. In simple
terms, what was this law telling us? (no equations please)
The bigger the applied force on a spring, the more it
stretches (where stretch is the distortion from the rest position). OK
.. I will give the equation F = kx where k is a constant and x is the
stretch.
Why do you feel cool when you initially get out of a pool
(especially on a windy day)?
This has everything to do with latent heat. When you get
out of the water, water rapidly evaporates from your body. Any phase
change is associated with a HUGE change in energy. Heat is extracted
from your body and is used to vaporize the water. You cool down.
Our bodies sweat to cool us down. This is also why you feel so
uncomfortable when the heat and humidity are high. The high humidity
means the rate of evaporation is lower so you don't have an efficient way to
cool off your body.
Why are steam burns so painful?
Latent heat! Look at the numbers in question #14.
When water changes from vapor to liquid, it must release LOTS of heat.
Think of a way you can determine the energy content of an
apple (how many calories it contains). Hint: besides
looking it up.
Scientists use a device call a "calorimeter" or "bomb
calorimeter" to do this. Here is how this works. You find a way to
burn the apple to release the heat (I'm guessing you would dehydrate the apple
first). The heat produced is the same amount energy you would get if you
digested the food. The combustion process is done so that all the heat
is used to warm water (the entire process is done in a chamber surrounded by
water). The heat gained by the water equals the heat released by the
apple. You need to make appropriate adjustments ... like taking into
account any heat you added to burn the food and other minor stuff, but the end
result is you get the chemical energy stored in the apple. Your answer
may vary.
Lift up any object and trace the energy it takes as far back
as you can.
The energy comes from the food you eat (and the oxygen
you breathe .. which is a necessary part of digestion). If you are a
vegetarian, the energy in your food comes from photosynthesis. If you
eat meat, it comes from the biomass of animals but that is built up from
plants using photosynthesis. The sunlight that drives photosynthesis
comes from nuclear fusion reactions inside the sun. Want to go another
step back? The atoms that fuse within the sun were byproducts of the big
bang (the thing that started the universe). At first, all energy was
radiation, but as the universe cooled, some of that energy was converted to
matter .... using Einstein's E=mc^2 equation. If you can go back further
than this .... you should be a physics major.
Now consider the many possible ways this same energy get
transformed once you drop this object.
The answers will vary. Initially you are
converting gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy. Then it
hits something and just about anything can happen. It could be used to
change the shape of the surface it hits (and even the shape of the object).
It can make sound energy. It can produce heat.
Now consider your scenarios (from the last question) in the
reverse direction (like running a film backwards). Do any of these energy
transformations violate the first law of thermodynamics? Which
transformations seem to violate the second law of thermodynamics?
None of these transformations violate the 1st law of
thermodynamics but most will violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Have
you ever watched a movie run backwards? The reason it looks funny is
because you witness energy conversions in ways you don't normally see.
Have you ever witnessed a ball (at rest) just start bouncing .. higher
and higher .. until it pops up to your hand (at the same time the surroundings
are getting cooler)? I doubt it!
Why is entropy sometimes referred to as the "arrow of time"? This question is
the hardest. In your answer give a specific example how the second law of
thermodynamics can be used to measure the direction of time.
The last question should shed some light on this answer.
It is not just energy conversions but the general behavior of matter that
seems to take a "one way" trip through time. In the backwards movie, you
see smoke particles slowly concentrate toward a candle (and then the candle
lights up). Cards lying randomly on the floor jump together to a single
deck in someone's hands. Entropy is all about "order" going toward
"disorder". If you had many individual pictures of these events, it
would be possible to place them in the correct chronological order based on
your understanding of entropy.
What seems to be the ultimate fate of the universe (from an energy
perspective)? That is, what form of energy (mentioned in the eBook) is the
only one left in the very, very distant future?
Most forms of energy convert to heat (random motion of
molecules). The ultimate state of "disorder" is to have the entire
universe all at one temperature. Physicists call this the "heat death"
of the universe. Astronomers have known for some time that the universe
is expanding. Recently, they have found that the rate of expansion is
accelerating with time (totally unexpected). It looks like we are headed
towards this "heat death" (but don't worry, we still have plenty of time yet).
If this expansion continues, at some very distant point in time, all forms of
matter will be stripped down to a subatomic level and all at the same
temperature. Kind of a boring end to the universe if you ask me.
Astronomers have discovered a new form of energy known as "dark energy". How
much do we know about it? What effect is it having?
Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is
expanding in the 1920’s. Almost all galaxies are moving away from each other
…. a result of the Big Bang. However, to the surprise of astronomers, they
also discovered (in the 1990’s) that the rate of galactic recession is
increasing with time. This was totally unexpected! As a result, they
“invented” a new form of energy to explain it – Dark Energy. Astronomers have
no idea about the nature of this form of energy other than it produces this
anti-gravity like effect. If this stuff really exists, there is A LOT of it.
After all, moving the universe around isn’t easy.
List 5 units of energy and find the definition of each unit.
Answers will vary. Some are BTU, Joule,
kilowatt-hour, erg, electron volt. I left out the definitions which are
easy to look up.
How much energy does it take to raise 1 gram of water 1 degree
Celsius? Hint: Look up the specific heat of water. How much energy does it
take to convert 1 gram of water into a vapor? Hint: Look up the latent heat
of vaporization for water. Which takes more energy - heat 1 gram of liquid
water from its freezing point to its boiling point OR vaporize 1 gram of water
at 100C?
By definition a calorie is the amount of energy
needed to raise 1 gram of water 1 degree Celsius. To convert 1 gram of
water from its freezing point (0 C) to its boiling point (100 C) takes 100
calories. It takes 80 calories to melt one gram of ice to water and
540 calories (wow!) of heat to vaporize 1 gram of water. It
should be clear why steam burns are so painful. 540 calories per gram is
a LOT of heat that must be released when water condenses from a vapor.
It also explains why a hurricane has so much energy since so much water vapor
is condensing in a concentrated area.
The average human's metabolism produces about 400 BTU of heat
per hour if awake but stationary, 250 BTU/hr (when sleeping). How many
bananas would you need to eat each day to break even? Hint: Assume each
banana contains 80 calories.
Assume you sleep 8 hours a day. 250 x 8 = 2000 BTU
(sleeping) 400 x 16 = 6,400 BTU (awake)
8,400 BTU = 2,116 calories (nutritional) or about 26 bananas. Note: a
nutritional calorie is NOT the same as the calorie defined in the last
unit. This is a source of confusion for many people. PS: I
would not eat 26 bananas in a day!
What horsepower motor is needed to lift 50 bales of hay (at
100 pounds each) to a height of 10 feet if the task must be completed in 10
minutes? Assume no friction or power losses.
50 x 100 = 5,000 pound x 10 feet = 50,000 ft pounds of
work. If you like, you can keep time in minutes but I'll convert to
600 seconds. Power required = 50,000 / 600 = 83.3 ft pound/s.
Convert
this to horsepower. Note: You would use foot pound - force/second.
Answer = .15 hp
A 3 hp pump is used to lift water to the top of a 30 foot
building. How many gallons can it move every minute?
3 hp = 99,046 foot - pound (force) / minute (using
this
link)
Power = energy / time
99,046 = 30 x W / 1 where W = weight in pounds
W = 3302 pounds of water = 396
gallons of water (from this
link under
miscellaneous)
Does your utility company's monthly bill charge you for energy
or power? Explain. Consider appliances (TVs, computers, etc). How are they
rated - power or energy? Explain.
The utility gives you a monthly bill for the amount of
energy you use. I guess you could argue that time is involved in
this last statement, but check your bill, it is listed in energy units .. not
power units. Your appliances are rated by power. The longer
you run the appliance, the more energy it consumes.
Note: Many appliances are rated by how much current it draws in amps. If
your device is listed in amps, multiply by 120 volts to get the power rating
in watts P = VI
What are the standard units used (by the company) for
electricity? For natural gas (or whatever you use for heat)? Provide a
number for each unit from your last bill (cost per unit, total units used, as
well as total cost). Convert the total units used for each (electric vs.
heat) to Joules for the sake of comparison. Which is the largest and
costliest? Make a pie chart to show where your household uses the most energy
(one by Joules and another by cost)
Electricity is rated in kilowatt - hours
Natural gas is rated in therms
I'll use data from my home as an example:
Summer Bill - August | Winter Bill - December | |
Electric | 28 kwh / day = 100 800 000 joule | 29 kwh / day = 104 400 000 joule |
Natural Gas | .61 therms / day = 64 343 044 joule | 4.25 therms / day = 448 291 700 joule |
Electric | $3.21 / day | $3.24 / day |
Natural gas | $.79 . day | $4.78 / day |
As you might guess, I use a higher percentage of natural gas in winter (mainly for heating).
What does an air conditioners SEER rating refer to? Are
you comparing energy, power or both? Is a higher number good or bad?
Air conditioners use electrical energy to MOVE heat.
The heat is moved from the air inside of your room to the outside air.
The same can be said about your refrigerator. So the efficiency of any
"heat mover" can be made by comparing the amount of actual heat energy moved
to the amount of electrical energy it takes to move the heat (electricity
used) during the same period of time. It is a
ratio, ... BTU cooling divided by electric energy used (in watt-hours).
You are comparing energy units here - BTU/watt-hours.
The higher the number, the more efficient the unit. In unit 5 we see how
refrigerators and air conditioners work.
A car typically needs 10-20 horsepower to move at constant
speed on a level surface. Where do you think most of the energy is dissipated
under these conditions?
A car running on a flat highway at a constant speed only
needs 10-20 hp to overcome friction (air friction mostly, but also rolling and
mechanical friction). However, your car needs much higher power for
accelerating (overcome inertia) and climbing hills (gains in gravitational
potential energy). Hybrid cars have a very small gasoline engine to
handle the common highway driving but uses the power assist of an electric
motor to accelerate and climb hills. For example, the Toyota Prius has a
gasoline engine rated at about 60 HP which can easily handle highway driving
on a flat surface. These cars are cool!
Why do you think most cars have a power rating from 100-200
horsepower (considering the facts given in the last question)? List at least
two reasons why all this extra power is needed.
see above
Levers
Machines
Which screw provides the highest mechanical advantage?
Explain!
The MA of a screw depends on the number of threads per
inch. The closer the threads, the higher the MA. The screw
depicted on the left has a higher MA. You can think of a screw as a ramp
shaped in a spiral. If you understood the answer to question #1, you
should see that the closer the threads, the gentler the slope. The screw on
the left is much easier to drive into a block of wood (but may take twice the
number of turns to go in the wood to the same depth). One
student pointed out that the screw on the left looked much like the kind used
for metal and the one on the right was for wood. They reasoned that
since it is much harder to drive any screw into metal than into wood, the left
one probably had the greater mechanical advantage. I don't know that
much about screws but I certainly liked that answer.
|
What is a ratchet and pawl? What is its function? Attach an image, or
find a web page with an image. Give one common application.
A ratchet and pawl is a gear where the teeth are slanted and a "stop" that only allows motion in one
direction. If you have a
winch, you have seen this in action. You hear the click - click -
click as you pull your boat on the trailer. If you let go of the handle,
the boat does not slide back into the water. Most socket wrenches have
one of these gizmos inside.
Compound Machines
Too numerous to mention but here are a few:
Bottle Jack - uses levers and hydraulics to lift a car
C-Clamp - uses a screw and lever
Bicycle - uses levers (for pedaling) and gears
One thing many student mention is a wheelbarrow. However, this is only a second class lever. The wheel offers no mechanical advantage so it is not considered a simple machine (despite what many web pages might claim).
History of Technology
Tesla - No one on the web has a better biography of Tesla than this site. http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-timeline-1856-birth-of-tesla No question ... the accomplishments of Tesla has one of the biggest impacts on our lives. After all, think of how dependent we are on electricity. He not only established AC current as the standard we use today, but also invented the induction motor to put that electricity to work.
Discovery by accident - Please click here to see a list
Ancient Inventions - Here is a short list of things we use today but have been around for over 2000 years (besides the computer known as the Antikythera mechanism, which I listed in the original question). I've clipped a few rather interesting posts (from students) for you to enjoy
Writing is the greatest of ancient discoveries (invention). Things like the Dispilio Tablet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispilio_Tablet) took us from a species of doers to a species of growers. Instead of doing what our ancestors had always done, a firm historical reference was started for the future generations of humans to learn and grow from. It has enabled everything from story telling to real learning institutions that have created some of the great minds of human history. Without writing, we would not be where we are today. Not even close.
The "Batteries of Baghdad"
It seems batteries are not the modern marvels that the non-scientific community believes they are. There is irrefutable proof that the earliest known batteries date back to around 250 B.C. in the area of Baghdad, Iraq (yep that place). Though there are arguments being made as to who and/or why the batteries were made and their purpose, there is no controversy as to whether or not they actually worked, since there have been replicas made that actually produced currents of .80 to .87 volts.
It has been conjectured that the placing of several of these batteries in series would produce a significant charge that would be sufficient enough to electroplate small objects. There have been some of these electroplated items found in various locations through the Middle East and the Asian continent. There was a girdle found in the entombed Chinese General Chu (circa 265-316 A.D) which was electroplated with an alloy of 85% aluminum with 10% copper and 5% manganese. This find has actually started debate as to what kind of batteries and how powerful this Chinese battery may have been since the "Batteries of Baghdad" could not provide enough voltage to electroplate an item as large as Chu's girdle.
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2442
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2804257.stm
Ancient Flying Machines
In 1903 the Wright brothers successfully made the first powered human flight. Before this accomplishment was even theorized or even before it was recorded in modern history, ancient civilizations were already designing this flying concept. In places like Egypt archeologists have found drafts of an ancient plane called the "wooden bird model". And in pre-Columbian America where archeologists have found statues of flying animals that resemble a plane.
See http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_7.htm#Colombia for more details
In addition, this is just a list of other "oldies but goodies":
Amplifier (Bronze Urns)
Aqueducts
Calendars
Candles
Compass
Decoding Device, Greece, 5th Century BCE
Eyeliner
Helmets
Lighthouses
Locks
Machines (China)
Mirrors
Musical Instruments
Odometer
Parachute
Paper
Soap
Scissors
Toilets (that flush)
Umbrellas
You can find more at http://www.smith.edu/hsc/museum/ancient_inventions/ or http://listverse.com/2009/03/29/top-10-ancient-inventions-you-think-are-modern/
Here is a great video (part 1/5) - Ancient Discoveries (Machines of the Gods) here.
Obsolete Technologies - Here are some thoughts sent in by students
Technological Wonders (really big technological projects/devices) - Here is my short list but anything big will work for me
Landing a man on the moon (covered in the
introduction)
Computers and the Internet (covered in the
introduction)
The Manhattan Project (the quest to build an atomic
bomb) which ultimately ended the second world war.
The Large Hadron Collider - Smashing subatomic
particles at CERN led to the discovery of the Higgs Boson
The ISS - An orbiting lab the size of a football
field helped us study the Earth as well as properties of a zero g environment
The Hubble Space Telescope - Opened a new window to
the universe
The James Webb Space Telescope - The successor to
Hubble still set to launch
Rovers on Mars - Wow, we can explore another world
from our rocking chairs at home